What I did:
In Chassis TSA mode Loopback0 Ip's of each LC's should be advertise through e-BGP peers of each remote LC's
How I did:
- Route-map policy to Advertise own/self Loopback IP to other internal iBGP peers with a community internal_community as define in constants.yml
- Route-map policy to match on above internal_community when route is received from internal iBGP peers and set a internal tag as define in constants.yml and also delete the internal_community so we don't send to any of e-BGP peers
- In TSA new route-map match on above internal tag and permit the route (Loopback0 IP's of remote LC's) and set the community to traffic_shift_community.
- In TSB delete the above new route-map.
How I verify:
Manual Verification
UT updated.
sonic-mgmt PR: sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#10239
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dosi <abdosi@microsoft.com>
What I did:
Revert the GTSM feature for VOQ iBGP session done as part of #16777.
Why I did:
On VOQ chassis BGP packets go over Recycle Port and then for Ingress Pipeline Routing making ttl as 254 and failing single hop check.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dosi <abdosi@microsoft.com>
What I did:
Make Sure for internal iBGP we are one-hop away (directly connected) by using Generic TTL security mechanism.
Why I did:
Without this change it's possible on packet chassis i-BGP can be established even if there no direct connection. Below is the example
- Let's say we have 3 LC's LC1/LC2/LC3 each having i-BGP session session with each other over Loopback4096
- Each LC's have static route towards other LC's Loopback4096 to establish i-BGP session
- LC1 learn default route 0.0.0.0/0 from it's e-BGP peers and send it over to LC2 and LC3 over i-BGP
- Now for some reason on LC2 static route towards LC3 is removed/not-present/some-issue we expect i-BGP session should go down between LC2 and LC3
- However i-BGP between LC2 and LC3 does not go down because of feature ip nht-resolve-via-default where LC2 will use default route to reach Loopback4096 of LC3. As it's using default route BGP packets from LC2 towards LC3 will first route to LC1 and then go to LC3 from there.
Above scenario can result in packet mis-forwarding on data plane
How I fixed it:-
To make sure BGP packets between i-BGP peers are not going with extra routing hop enable using GTSM feature
neighbor PEER ttl-security hops NUMBER
This command enforces Generalized TTL Security Mechanism (GTSM), as specified in RFC 5082. With this command, only neighbors that are the specified number of hops away will be allowed to become neighbors. This command is mutually exclusive with ebgp-multihop.
We set hop count as 1 which makes FRR to reject BGP connection if we receive BGP packets if it's TTL < 255. Also setting this attribute make sure i-BGP frames are originated with IP TTL of 255.
How I verify:
Manual Verification of above scenario. See blow BGP packets receive with IP TTL 254 (additional routing hop) we are seeing FIN TCP flags as BGP is rejecting the connection
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dosi <abdosi@microsoft.com>
What I did:
Enable Sending BGP Community over internal neighbors over iBGP Session
Microsoft ADO: 25268695
Why I did:
Without this change BGP community send by e-BGP Peers are not carry-forward to other e-BGP peers.
str2-xxxx-lc1-2# show bgp ipv6 20c0:a801::/64
BGP routing table entry for 20c0:a801::/64, version 52141
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
Not advertised to any peer
65000 65500
2603:10e2:400::6 from 2603:10e2:400::6 (3.3.3.6)
Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, internal, best (First path received)
Last update: Tue Sep 26 16:08:26 2023
str2-xxxx-lc1-2# show ip bgp 192.168.35.128/25
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.35.128/25, version 52688
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
Not advertised to any peer
65000 65502
3.3.3.6 from 3.3.3.6 (3.3.3.6)
Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, internal, best (First path received)
Last update: Tue Sep 26 15:45:51 2023
After the change
str2-xxxx-lc2-2(config)# router bgp 65100
str2-xxxx-lc2-2(config-router)# address-family ipv4
str2-xxxx-lc2-2(config-router-af)# neighbor INTERNAL_PEER_V4 send-community
str2-xxxx-lc2-2(config-router-af)# exit
str2-xxxx-lc2-2(config-router)# address-family ipv6
str2-xxxx-lc2-2(config-router-af)# neighbor INTERNAL_PEER_V6 send-community
str2-xxxx-lc1-2# show bgp ipv6 20c0:a801::/64
BGP routing table entry for 20c0:a801::/64, version 52400
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
Not advertised to any peer
65000 65500
2603:10e2:400::6 from 2603:10e2:400::6 (3.3.3.6)
Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, internal, best (First path received)
**Community: 1111:1111**
Last update: Tue Sep 26 16:10:19 2023
str2-xxxx-lc1-2# show ip bgp 192.168.35.128/25
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.35.128/25, version 52947
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
Not advertised to any peer
65000 65502
3.3.3.6 from 3.3.3.6 (3.3.3.6)
Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, internal, best (First path received)
**Community: 1111:1111**
Last update: Tue Sep 26 16:10:09 2023
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dosi <abdosi@microsoft.com>
Why I did it
Add no-export to bgp sentinel community-list. So that bgp updates from bgp sentinel service must match sentinel community and no-export, otherwise, the bgp update will be dropped.
Work item tracking
Microsoft ADO (24946274):
How I did it
Add no-export to bgp sentinel community-list.
How to verify it
Run UT, case would pass. Build the image and start the device. Add bgp sentinel and check that no-export community exist in bgp sentinel community list.
What I did:
Fix the Loopback0 IPv6 address of LC's in chassis not reachable from peer devices.
Why I did:
For Ipv6 Loopback0 address we only advertise /64 subnet to the peer devices. However, in case of chassis each LC will have it own /128 address of that /64 subnet . Since this /128 address does not get advertised peer devices can-not ping/reach the LC's loopback0.
How I fix:
Advertise /128 Loopback0 Ipv6 address only between i-BGP peers. This way even though /64 is advertised to e-BGP peer devices when packet reaches any of LC's it can reach the appropriate LC's.
How I verify:
Manual verification
UT added for same.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dosi <abdosi@microsoft.com>
Why I did it
For route registry service, in order to block hijacked routes, IBGP session needs to be set up from BGP sentinel service to SONiC, and BGP sentinel service advertise the same route with higher local-preference and no export community. So that SONiC takes the route from BGP sentinel as the best path and does not advertise the route to EBGP peers.
In order to do that, new route-maps are needed. So this change adds a new set of templates, keeping BGPSentinel peers out of the other templates.
Work item tracking
Microsoft ADO (number only): 24451346
How I did it
Add sentinel_community in constants.yml, route from BGPSentinel do not match this community will be denied.
Add support to convert BGPSentinel related configuration in the BGPPeerPassive element of the minigraph to a new BGP_SENTINELS table in CONFIG_DB
Add a new set of "sentinels" templates to docker-fpm-frr
Add a new BGP peer manager to bgpcfgd, to add neighbors from the BGP_SENTINELS table using the "sentinels" templates
Add a test case for minigraph.py, making sure the BGPSentinel and BGPSentinelV6 elements create BGP_SENTINELS DB entry.
Add a set of test cases for the new sentinels templates in sonic-bgpcfgd tests.
Add sonic-bgp-sentinel.yang and a set of testcases for the yang file.
How to verify it
Testcases and UT newly added would pass.
Setup IPv4 and IPv6 BGPSentinel services in minigraph, and load minigraph, show CONFIG_DB and "show runningconfig bgp", configuration would be loaded successfully.
Using t1-lag topo and setup IBGP session from BGPSentinel to SONiC loopback address, IBGP session would up.
Advertise route from BGPSentinel to T1 with sentinel_community, higher local-preference and no-export communiyt. In T1, show bgp route, the result is "Not advertise to any EBGP peer".
Withdraw the route in BGPSentinel, in T1, route would advertise to EBGP peers.
Advertise route from T1 that does not match sentinel_community, in T1, would not see the route in show bgp route.
What I did:
Workaround for the issue seen here : FRRouting/frr#13682
It seems there is timing issue where there are multiple recursive lookup needed to resolve nexthop of the route it's possible that it does not happen correctly causing route to remain in inactive state
Issue is seen on chassis-packet as there 2 level of recursive lookup needed for a given e-BGP learnt route
- Level1 to resolve e-BGP peer (connected route via bgp ) over Loopback4096 (i-BGP peering)
- Level 2 Loopback4096 over backend port-channels next-hops
For VOQ chassis there is no e-BGP peer (connected route via bgp ) resolution as route is added as Static route by orchagent over Ethernet-IB.
Also as part of this remove route-map policy from instance.conf.j2 as same is define in peer-group.j2.
Microsoft ADO: https://msazure.visualstudio.com/One/_workitems/edit/24198507
How I verify:
Functional Verification manually
Updated UT.
We will be adding sanity check in sonic-mgmt to make sure none of route are in inactive state.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dosi <abdosi@microsoft.com>
Why I did it
To support BGPMon sessions from each T2 linecard ASIC
Work item tracking
Microsoft ADO (number only): 17873174
How I did it
Added change in BGPMon configuration to use Loopback4096 as source interface, since this has a unique IP per ASIC.
How to verify it
Tested by manually setting up BGPMon session on T2 LC and verified that Loopback4096 could be used as source
What I did:
In FRR command update source <interface-name> is not at address-family level. Because of this
internal peer route-map for ipv6 were getting applied to ipv4 address family. As a result
TSA over iBGP for Ipv6 was not getting applied.
How I verify:
Manual Verification of TSA over both ipv4 and ipv6 after fix works fine.
Updated UT for this.
Added sonic-mgmt test gap: sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#8170
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dosi <abdosi@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Stepan Blyschak stepanb@nvidia.com
DEPENDS: #12852
Why I did it
To support BGP pending FIB suppression.
How I did it
I backported patches from FRR 8.4 feature that allows communicating ASIC route status back to FRR.
Also, added a new field in DEVICE_METADATA YANG model table. Added UT for YANG model changes.
How to verify it
Run on the switch.
Why I did it
To ensure, that after a BGP startup, dualtor T0 receives BGP updates before sending out BGP updates.
Please refer to sonic-net/SONiC#1161 for more details.
How I did it
add coalesce-time 10000 to the frr bgp startup config.
Signed-off-by: Longxiang Lyu <lolv@microsoft.com>
bgpd.main.conf.j2: bugfix-9739
* Update bgpd.main.conf.j2 to gracefully handle the bgp configuration cases for when 'bgp_asn' is set to 'None', 'Null', or missing.
How I did it
Include a conditional statement to avoid configuring bgp in FRR when 'bgp_asn' is missing or set to 'None' or 'Null'
How to verify it
Configure 'bgp_asn' as 'None', 'Null' or have it missing from configurations and verify that /etc/frr/bgpd.conf does not have invalid bgp configurations like 'router bgp None'
Description for the changelog
Update bgpd.main.conf.j2 to gracefully handle the bgp configuration cases for when 'bgp_asn' is set to 'None', 'Null', or missing for bugfix 9739.
Signed-off-by: cchoate54@gmail.com
* [BGP]Adding configuration knob to allow advertise Loopback ipv6 /128 prefix
By default when IPv6 address is configured with /128 as subnet mask in Loopback0 interface, it will be advertised as prefix with /64 subnet.
To control this behavior a new field 'bgp_adv_lo_prefix_as_128' is introduced in DEVICE_METADATA table which when set to true will advertise prefix with /128 subnet as it is.
Why I did it
In the recent minigraph changes we add separate BGP session configuration for V4 and V6 internal VoQ neighbors.
This PR is adding different Peer groups for V4 and V6 neighbors
How I did it
Add VOQ_CHASSIS_V4_PEER and VOQ_CHASSIS_V6_PEER groups
Add extra Unit tests
How to verify it
Signed-off-by: Arvindsrinivasan Lakshmi Narasimhan <arlakshm@microsoft.com>
What I did:
Updated Jinja Template to enable BGP Graceful Restart based on device role. By default it will be enable only if the device role type is TorRouter.
Why I did:-
By default FRR is configured in Graceful Helper mode. Graceful Restart is needed on T0/TorRouter only since the device can go for warm-reboot. For T1/LeafRouter it need to be in Helper mode only
Updated BGP Template for the case:
1. For Packet Chassis do not advertise Loopback4096 address into BGP as there is Static Route for same.
Having this route in BGP causes two level of recursion in Zebra and cause assert in Zebra
when there are many nexthop involved
2. Advertise only P2P Connected IP's into BGP (External Peers). For Packet chassis we have backend IP Interface subnet and if
they get advertised into BGP then it also causes recursion
The BGP_VOQ_CHASSIS_NEIGHBOR keepalive and holdtime timers are
configured similar to general neighbors. Changes are done to configure
BGP_VOQ_CHASSIS_NEIGHBOR timers similar to BGP_INTENAL_NEIGBOR since voq
chassis bgp neighbors are similar to bgp internal neighbors in
multi-asic. As it is done for bgp internal neighbors, the keepalive and
holdtime timers are set to 3 and 10 seconds respectively. Also similar
to bgp internal neighbors, connection retry timer is also configured for
voq chassis bgp neighbors.
Signed-off-by: vedganes <vedavinayagam.ganesan@nokia.com>
What I did:
Fix the typo in Internal Peer Group template for Packet-based Chassis.
Address Review comments of PR: [chassis-packet] minigraph parsing and BGP template changes #8966
- Static Route Parsing for Host
- Formatting of chassis port_config.ini
1. Changes for Generation LC-Graph for packet-based chassis.
2. Added Support Ipv6 Peering on Loopback4096 for voq also
3. Updated asic topology yml files to be offset of slot
4. Made slot_num to take string slot<number> instead of number
5. Consolidated template_dpg_voq_asic.j2 into dpg_asic.j2
6. Remove Loopback4096 from asic topology and parse as dut invertory for
multi-asic
7. Updated topo_facts parsing for asic topology_
8. Internal BGP Session rename from <VoqChassisInternal> to <ChassisInternal> and take switch_type as value.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dosi <abdosi@microsoft.com>
For multiasic, the back end asics use ip addresss of Loopback4096 for BGP router id. In VOQ multi-asic chassis there are no back end asics. All the asics are front end and the iBGP connections are established via Ethernet-IB of asics. Since these asics are not designated as BackEnd, the ip address of interface Loopback0 is used as BGP router id. Since the ip address of Loopback0 is same for all the asics in the line card, same router id is used for voq iBGP configurations and hence the iBGP connections are not established. Changes are done to fix this
Why I did it
There are scenarios that End-of-RIB comes from a part of the peers arrives after reconciliation. In such scenarios, if the route selection deferral timer has the default value of 360 seconds, FRR would not set up routes and all routes would be removed after reconciliation. This PR reduces the route selection deferral timer so that at least routes to parts of the peers get restored at the point of reconciliation.
Fix#7488
How I did it
Reduce route selection deferral timer for bgp graceful restart to 15 seconds.
Signed-off-by: Arvindsrinivasan Lakshmi Narasimhan <arlakshm@microsoft.com>
In the multi asic platforms all the ASIC are advertising the same IPv6 /64 network from Loopback4096.
Therefore, the IPv6 loopback address of backend asic is not learnt on the frontend asic.
Change the bgpd.conf.main.conf.j2 template file to advertise the Loopback4096 ipv6 address as /128
This commit has following changes:
* Add templates and code to support VoQ chassis iBGP peers
* Add support to convert a new VoQChassisInternal element in the
BGPSession element of the minigraph to a new BGP_VOQ_CHASSIS_NEIGHBOR
table in CONFIG_DB.
* Add a new set of "voq_chassis" templates to docker-fpm-frr
* Add a new BGP peer manager to bgpcfgd to add neighbors from the
BGP_VOQ_CHASSIS_NEIGHBOR table using the voq_chassis templates.
* Add a test case for minigraph.py, making sure the VoQChassisInternal
element creates a BGP_VOQ_CHASSIS_NEIGHBOR entry, but not if its
value is "false".
* Add a set of test cases for the new voq_chassis templates in
sonic-bgpcfgd tests.
Note that the templates expect the new
"bgp bestpath peer-type multipath-relax" bgpd configuration to be
available.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Mikkelson <jmmikkel@arista.com>
The default bgp connect retry timer is 120 seconds. A reconnection will happen 120 seconds if the initial connection fails. This PR aims to allow a more frequent retry.
Why I did it
It was observed that on a multi-asic DUT bootup, the BGP internal sessions between ASIC's was taking more time to get ESTABLISHED than external BGP sessions. The internal sessions was coming up almost exactly 120 secs later.
In multi-asic platform the bgp dockers ( which is per ASIC ) on switch start are bring brought up around the same time and they try to make the bgp sessions with neighbors (in peer ASIC's) which may be not be completely up. This results in BGP connect fail and the retry happens after 120sec which is the default Connect Retry Timer
How I did it
Add the command to set the bgp neighboring session retry timer to 10sec for internal bgp neighbors.
1. Made the command next-hop-self force only applicable on back-end asic bgp. This is done so that BGPL iBGP session running on backend can send e-BGP learn nexthop. Back end asic FRR is able to recursively resolve the eBGP nexthop in its routing table since it knows about all the connected routes advertise from front end asic.
2. Made all front-end asic bgp use global loopback ip (Loopback0) as router id and back end asic bgp use Loopbacl4096 as ruter-id and originator id for Route-Reflector. This is done so that routes learnt by external peer do not see Loopback4096 as router id in show ip bgp <route-prerfix> output.
3. To handle above change need to pass Loopback4096 from BGP manager for jinja2 template generation. This was missing and this change/fix is needed for this also https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/dockers/docker-fpm-frr/frr/bgpd/templates/dynamic/instance.conf.j2#L27
4. Enhancement to add mult_asic specific bgpd template generation unit test cases.
Enable BBR config allowas-in 1 for internal peers
Why I did:
To advertise BBR routes learnt via e-BGP peer in one asic/namespace to another iBGP asic/namespace via Route Reflector.
- Support for non-template based FRR configurations (BGP, route-map, OSPF, static route..etc) using config DB schema.
- Support for save & restore - Jinja template based config-DB data read and apply to FRR during startup
**- How I did it**
- add frrcfgd service
- when frr_mgmg_framework_config is set, frrcfgd starts in bgp container
- when user changed the BGP or other related table entries in config DB, frrcfgd will run corresponding VTYSH commands to program on FRR.
- add jinja template to generate FRR config file to be used by FRR daemons while bgp container restarted
**- How to verify it**
1. Add/delete data on config DB and then run VTYSH "show running-config" command to check if FRR configuration changed.
1. Restart bgp container and check if generated FRR config file is correct and run VTYSH "show running-config" command to check if FRR configuration is consistent with attributes in config DB
Co-authored-by: Zhenhong Zhao <zhenhong.zhao@dell.com>
* Use 20 and 30 route-map entries instead of 2 and 3 for TSA
* Added support for dynamic "Allow list" default action.
Co-authored-by: Pavel Shirshov <pavel.contrib@gmail.com>
Fixed TSA bugs:
1. TSA didn't advertise Loopback ipv6 address
2. TSA and TSB changed BGP dynamic and BGP monitors sessions
**- How to verify it**
Build an image and run on your DUT.
```
admin@str-s6100-acs-1:~$ TSA
System Mode: Normal -> Maintenance
admin@str-s6100-acs-1:~$ vtysh -c 'show bgp ipv4 neighbors 10.0.0.1 advertised-routes'
BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 10.1.0.32, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 64601
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 10.1.0.32/32 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
Total number of prefixes 1
admin@str-s6100-acs-1:~$ vtysh -c 'show bgp ipv6 neighbors fc00::a advertised-routes'
BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 10.1.0.32, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 64601
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> fc00:1::/64 :: 0 32768 i
Total number of prefixes 1
admin@str-s6100-acs-1:~$ TSB
System Mode: Maintenance -> Normal
```
Co-authored-by: Pavel Shirshov <pavel.contrib@gmail.com>
- Why I did it
Update the routine is_bgp_session_internal() by checking the BGP_INTERNAL_NEIGHBOR table.
Additionally to address the review comment #5520 (comment)
Add timer settings as will in the internal session templates and keep it minimal as these sessions which will always be up.
Updates to the internal tests data + add all of it to template tests.
- How I did it
Updated the APIs and the template files.
- How to verify it
Verified the internal BGP sessions are displayed correctly with show commands with this API is_bgp_session_internal()
* Convert bgpcfgd to python3
Convert bgpmon to python3
Fix some issues in bgpmon
* Add python3-swsscommon as depends
* Install dependencies
* reorder deps
Co-authored-by: Pavel Shirshov <pavel.contrib@gmail.com>
* Initial commit for BGP internal neighbor table support.
> Add new template named "internal" for the internal BGP sessions
> Add a new table in database "BGP_INTERNAL_NEIGHBOR"
> The internal BGP sessions will be stored in this new table "BGP_INTERNAL_NEIGHBOR"
* Changes in template generation tests with the introduction of internal neighbor template files.
**- Why I did it**
To introduce dynamic support of BBR functionality into bgpcfgd.
BBR is adding `neighbor PEER_GROUP allowas-in 1' for all BGP peer-groups which points to T0
Now we can add and remove this configuration based on CONFIG_DB entry
**- How I did it**
I introduced a new CONFIG_DB entry:
- table name: "BGP_BBR"
- key value: "all". Currently only "all" is supported, which means that all peer-groups which points to T0s will be updated
- data value: a dictionary: {"status": "status_value"}, where status_value could be either "enabled" or "disabled"
Initially, when bgpcfgd starts, it reads initial BBR status values from the [constants.yml](https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/pull/5626/files#diff-e6f2fe13a6c276dc2f3b27a5bef79886f9c103194be4fcb28ce57375edf2c23cR34). Then you can control BBR status by changing "BGP_BBR" table in the CONFIG_DB (see examples below).
bgpcfgd knows what peer-groups to change fron [constants.yml](https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/pull/5626/files#diff-e6f2fe13a6c276dc2f3b27a5bef79886f9c103194be4fcb28ce57375edf2c23cR39). The dictionary contains peer-group names as keys, and a list of address-families as values. So when bgpcfgd got a request to change the BBR state, it changes the state only for peer-groups listed in the constants.yml dictionary (and only for address families from the peer-group value).
**- How to verify it**
Initially, when we start SONiC FRR has BBR enabled for PEER_V4 and PEER_V6:
```
admin@str-s6100-acs-1:~$ vtysh -c 'show run' | egrep 'PEER_V.? allowas'
neighbor PEER_V4 allowas-in 1
neighbor PEER_V6 allowas-in 1
```
Then we apply following configuration to the db:
```
admin@str-s6100-acs-1:~$ cat disable.json
{
"BGP_BBR": {
"all": {
"status": "disabled"
}
}
}
admin@str-s6100-acs-1:~$ sonic-cfggen -j disable.json -w
```
The log output are:
```
Oct 14 18:40:22.450322 str-s6100-acs-1 DEBUG bgp#bgpcfgd: Received message : '('all', 'SET', (('status', 'disabled'),))'
Oct 14 18:40:22.450620 str-s6100-acs-1 DEBUG bgp#bgpcfgd: execute command '['vtysh', '-f', '/tmp/tmpmWTiuq']'.
Oct 14 18:40:22.681084 str-s6100-acs-1 DEBUG bgp#bgpcfgd: execute command '['vtysh', '-c', 'clear bgp peer-group PEER_V4 soft in']'.
Oct 14 18:40:22.904626 str-s6100-acs-1 DEBUG bgp#bgpcfgd: execute command '['vtysh', '-c', 'clear bgp peer-group PEER_V6 soft in']'.
```
Check FRR configuraiton and see that no allowas parameters are there:
```
admin@str-s6100-acs-1:~$ vtysh -c 'show run' | egrep 'PEER_V.? allowas'
admin@str-s6100-acs-1:~$
```
Then we apply enabling configuration back:
```
admin@str-s6100-acs-1:~$ cat enable.json
{
"BGP_BBR": {
"all": {
"status": "enabled"
}
}
}
admin@str-s6100-acs-1:~$ sonic-cfggen -j enable.json -w
```
The log output:
```
Oct 14 18:40:41.074720 str-s6100-acs-1 DEBUG bgp#bgpcfgd: Received message : '('all', 'SET', (('status', 'enabled'),))'
Oct 14 18:40:41.074720 str-s6100-acs-1 DEBUG bgp#bgpcfgd: execute command '['vtysh', '-f', '/tmp/tmpDD6SKv']'.
Oct 14 18:40:41.587257 str-s6100-acs-1 DEBUG bgp#bgpcfgd: execute command '['vtysh', '-c', 'clear bgp peer-group PEER_V4 soft in']'.
Oct 14 18:40:42.042967 str-s6100-acs-1 DEBUG bgp#bgpcfgd: execute command '['vtysh', '-c', 'clear bgp peer-group PEER_V6 soft in']'.
```
Check FRR configuraiton and see that the BBR configuration is back:
```
admin@str-s6100-acs-1:~$ vtysh -c 'show run' | egrep 'PEER_V.? allowas'
neighbor PEER_V4 allowas-in 1
neighbor PEER_V6 allowas-in 1
```
*** The test coverage ***
Below is the test coverage
```
---------- coverage: platform linux2, python 2.7.12-final-0 ----------
Name Stmts Miss Cover
----------------------------------------------------
bgpcfgd/__init__.py 0 0 100%
bgpcfgd/__main__.py 3 3 0%
bgpcfgd/config.py 78 41 47%
bgpcfgd/directory.py 63 34 46%
bgpcfgd/log.py 15 3 80%
bgpcfgd/main.py 51 51 0%
bgpcfgd/manager.py 41 23 44%
bgpcfgd/managers_allow_list.py 385 21 95%
bgpcfgd/managers_bbr.py 76 0 100%
bgpcfgd/managers_bgp.py 193 193 0%
bgpcfgd/managers_db.py 9 9 0%
bgpcfgd/managers_intf.py 33 33 0%
bgpcfgd/managers_setsrc.py 45 45 0%
bgpcfgd/runner.py 39 39 0%
bgpcfgd/template.py 64 11 83%
bgpcfgd/utils.py 32 24 25%
bgpcfgd/vars.py 1 0 100%
----------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 1128 530 53%
```
**- Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)**
- [ ] 201811
- [x] 201911
- [x] 202006
implements a new feature: "BGP Allow list."
This feature allows us to control which IP prefixes are going to be advertised via ebgp from the routes received from EBGP neighbors.
Jinja2 templates rendered using Python 3 interpreter, are required
to conform with Python 3 new semantics.
singed-off-by: Tamer Ahmed <tamer.ahmed@microsoft.com>
implements a new feature: "BGP Allow list."
This feature allows us to control which IP prefixes are going to be advertised via ebgp from the routes received from EBGP neighbors.
