Signed-off-by: Neetha John nejo@microsoft.comFixes#7531
Why I did it
To enable bgp sessions to be established over subinterfaces
How I did it
Listen to VLAN_SUB_INTERFACE table in config db
How to verify it
Bgp sessions were established successfully over subinterface
#### Why I did it
The label for PSU related sensors on the Spectrum-2 platform is not aligned with the physical location of the PSU.
#### How I did it
Update the label in the sensor conf file for those relevant platforms
Signed-off-by: Kebo Liu <kebol@nvidia.com>
#### Why I did it
If a process limits using nodes by mempolicy/cpusets, and those nodes become memory exhaustion status, one process may be killed by oom-killer.
No panic occurs in this case, because other node's memory may be free.
This means system total status may be not fatal yet.
#### How I did it
Remove 'vm.panic_on_oom=1' kernel flag from 'vmcore-sysctl.conf '
Signed-off-by: Neetha John <nejo@microsoft.com>
Why I did it
PG profile settings need to be aligned with Arista-7050-QX-32S
How I did it
Copy over the current settings from Arista-7050-QX-32S and define params for 10G and 1G speeds as well
Signed-off-by: Neetha John nejo@microsoft.comFixes#7531
Why I did it
To enable bgp sessions to be established over subinterfaces
How I did it
Listen to VLAN_SUB_INTERFACE table in config db
How to verify it
Bgp sessions were established successfully over subinterface
When FECDisabled is set to true in minigraph.py, push 'fec' 'none' explicitly to config_db. When 'fec' is defined in port_config.ini do not override it with 'rs' for 100G
Backport of #7667 to 202012 branch.
Signed-off-by: Neetha John <nejo@microsoft.com>
Why I did it
Need proper MMU and Qos settings for Arista-7050QX-32S-S4Q31
How I did it
Updated the settings based on Arista-7050-QX-32S
#### Why I did it
xcvrd crashes when the application advertisement capability flag is not seen for few transceivers.
#### How I did it
Initialize the additional application capability in dunder init
#### Why I did it
To avoid the following logs
```
Mar 15 15:52:04.599302 igk-dut-04 INFO database#/supervisord: flushdb /bin/bash: /usr/local/bin/flush_unused_database: /usr/bin/python: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
Mar 15 15:52:04.599947 igk-dut-04 INFO database#supervisord 2021-03-15 15:52:04,599 INFO exited: flushdb (exit status 126; not expected)
```
#### How I did it
Fix shebang
#### How to verify it
Check the logs
Map priority 0 to TC 1 and priority 1 to TC 0
Send traffic on priority 0 and 1 and verified that it gets mapped correctly in hw
Signed-off-by: Neetha John <nejo@microsoft.com>
Why I did it
Skip to use the web proxy when the packages have been in the proxy server.
For sai packages or the other packages, we will upload the the proxy server directly, the reproducible will skip to check the site, not necessary to change the version files.
#### Why I did it
Improve readability of `show environment` output.
#### How I did it
In all sensors.conf, give the customized labels according to HW specifications for each model.
Signed-off-by: Sean Wu <sean_wu@edge-core.com>
Add support for Accton as9726-32d platform
This pull request is based on as9716-32d, so I reference as9716-32d to create new model: as9726-32d.
This module do not need led driver to control led, FPGA can handle it.
I also implement API2.0(sonic_platform) for this model, CPLD driver, PSU driver, Fan driver to control these HW behavior.
Why I did it
Fix issues below.
#7133#6602
So, remove the dps200 driver from the platform-specific driver.
Then, add the dps200 module driver to the Linux kernel tree.
How I did it
Remove the dps200 driver from the platform-specific driver and add the dps200 module driver to the Linux kernel.
How to verify it
Build an image with Azure/sonic-linux-kernel#207
Then, install to the Haliburton.
Why I did it
Add bgpcfgd support for static routes.
How I did it
Add bgpcfgd support to subscribe changes in STATIC_ROUTE table in CONFIG_DB and program via vtysh. The key of STATIC_ROUTE table is formatted as STATIC_ROUTE|vrf|ip_prefix, while the vrf is optional. If would be treated the same as "default" if no vrf is given.
Add unit tests.
Make sure Everflow always gets classified as Mirror table and not as Control Plane on multi-asic platforms.
Why I did:
In Multi-asic platforms we generate Everflow acl table data from minigraph for both host and namespace.
It is possible in multi-asic minigraph if there are no external port-channel (Only Router Port IP Interface) then Everflow table will have no binded interface in host and will gets classified as Control Plane ACL while in namespace gets classified as Mirror Table.
For ACL Rule generation we read global db as source of truth for acl table information and so for everflow rule generation if tables gets classified as Control plane we can generate rules with invalid action causing orchagent to throw runtime error.
How I did:
If the table is attach to erspan interface in minigraph then it always gets classified as mirror table.
1. Made the command next-hop-self force only applicable on back-end asic bgp. This is done so that BGPL iBGP session running on backend can send e-BGP learn nexthop. Back end asic FRR is able to recursively resolve the eBGP nexthop in its routing table since it knows about all the connected routes advertise from front end asic.
2. Made all front-end asic bgp use global loopback ip (Loopback0) as router id and back end asic bgp use Loopbacl4096 as ruter-id and originator id for Route-Reflector. This is done so that routes learnt by external peer do not see Loopback4096 as router id in show ip bgp <route-prerfix> output.
3. To handle above change need to pass Loopback4096 from BGP manager for jinja2 template generation. This was missing and this change/fix is needed for this also https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/dockers/docker-fpm-frr/frr/bgpd/templates/dynamic/instance.conf.j2#L27
4. Enhancement to add mult_asic specific bgpd template generation unit test cases.
Enable BBR config allowas-in 1 for internal peers
Why I did:
To advertise BBR routes learnt via e-BGP peer in one asic/namespace to another iBGP asic/namespace via Route Reflector.
What I did:-
For multi-asic platforms added iptable v4 rule to communicate on docker bridge ip
For multi-asic platforms extend iptable v4 rule for iptable v6 also
For multi-asic program made all internal rules applicable for all protocols (not filter based on tcp/udp). This is done to be consistent same as local host rule
For multi-asic platforms made nat rule (to forward traffic from namespace to host) generic for all protocols and also use Source IP if present for matching
Why I did it
start pcie-check.service after config-setup.service since pcie_util depends on device_info which is available with config db metadata.
How I did it
Add config-setup.service as a dependency of pcie-check.service
How to verify it
Upon reboot, check if the pcie-check.sh throws the platform api error which is dependent on DEVICE_METADATA
py2/py3/deb packages names are case insensitive, and the versions map
key should be the same for packages whose name can have different cases.
For example, in files/build/versions/default/versions-py3, package
"click==7.1.2" is pinned; and in
files/build/versions/dockers/docker-sonic-vs/versions-py3, package
"Click==7.0" is pinned.
Without this fix, the aggregated versions-py3 file used for building
docker-sonic-vs looks like below:
...
click==7.1.2
Click==7.0
...
However, we actually want "click==7.0" to overwrite "click==7.1.2" for
docker-sonic-vs build.
This is to pick up BRCM SAI 4.3.3.5-2 which contains 2 main changes:
1. hsdk-6.5.21-p1.patch (to address some field problems related to SDK issue.
2. Fix for CS00012097141 (remove some unnecessary debug setting that was causing non functional impacting problem at boot time)
Preliminary tests looks fine. BGP neighbors were all up with proper routes programmed
interfaces are all up
Manually ran the following test cases on S6100 DUT and all passed:
```
ipfwd/test_dir_bcast.py
fib/test_fib.py
vxlan/test_vxlan_decap.py
decap/test_decap.py
fdb/test_fdb.py
```
202012 branch is using reproducible build. The versions-py3 file must contains correct pip3 package version. Otherwise we will get a build error
```
Step 31/74 : RUN pip3 install scapy==2.4.4 pyroute2==0.5.14 netifaces==0.10.9
---> Running in d7a2401dd21d
Collecting scapy==2.4.4
Downloading scapy-2.4.4.tar.gz (1.0 MB)
Collecting pyroute2==0.5.14
Downloading pyroute2-0.5.14.tar.gz (873 kB)
ERROR: Cannot install netifaces==0.10.9 because these package versions have conflicting dependencies.
The conflict is caused by:
The user requested netifaces==0.10.9
The user requested (constraint) netifaces==0.10.7
To fix this you could try to:
1. loosen the range of package versions you've specified
2. remove package versions to allow pip attempt to solve the dependency conflict
ERROR: ResolutionImpossible: for help visit https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/user_guide/#fixing-conflicting-dependencies
The command '/bin/sh -c pip3 install scapy==2.4.4 pyroute2==0.5.14 netifaces==0.10.9' returned a non-zero code: 1
[ FAIL LOG END ] [ target/docker-sonic-vs.gz ]
```
https://github.com/mbj4668/pyang/blob/master/pyang/repository.py#L93 throws an exception with pip 21.1
add ietf yang model explicitly to the build process fix the test failure.
tests/test_sonic_yang_models.py .F [ 66%]
tests/yang_model_tests/test_yang_model.py . [100%]
Failed: pyang -f tree ./yang-models/*.yang > ./yang-models/sonic_yang_tree
----------------------------- Captured stderr call -----------------------------
./yang-models/sonic-acl.yang:8: error: module "ietf-inet-types" not found in search path
./yang-models/sonic-device_metadata.yang:8: error: module "ietf-yang-types" not found in search path
Signed-off-by: Guohan Lu <lguohan@gmail.com>
LED_PROC_INIT_SOC variable was incorrectly referenced as LED_SOC_INIT_SOC. Introduced in #5483
Rather than fixing the typo, I decided to simplify the script, removing the need for the conditional altogether by moving the bcmcmd call inside the conditional which checks for the presence of LED_SOC_INIT_SOC.
fuser support is required since new cisco hardware watchdog plugin uses them to check anyone else use's /dev/watchdogX resource. The actual validation happens in the platform code, but the package is required for pmon container. Currently the /dev/watchdogX is being used by cisco platform-monitor service. Cisco chassis level watchdog plugin uses "fuser" to claim the watchdog release from platform-monitor service.
Why I did it
Finding running containers through "docker ps" breaks when kubernetes deploys container, as the names are mangled.
How I did it
The data is is available from FEATURE table, which takes care of kubernetes deployment too.
How to verify it
Deploy a feature via kubernetes and don't expect error from container_check.
