Why I did it
Added to allow test_crm_route to pass; the test tries to add a /126 ipv6 route and this change is required in order for the count of available routes to be updated correctly.
Why I did it
TX FIR tuning should be done based on the type of inserted transceiver
How I did it
Add media_settings.json which contains the tuning data for 100G optic and 400G optic.
How to verify it
Tested against x86_64-arista_7800r3a_36d2_lc
Why I did it
The PR is to apply separated DSCP_TO_TC_MAP and TC_TO_QUEUE_MAP to uplink ports on dualtor.
The traffic with DSCP 2 and DSCP 6 from T1 is treated as lossless traffic.
DSCP TC Queue
2 2 2
6 6 6
Traffic with DSCP 2 or DSCP 6 from downlink is still treated as lossy traffic as before.
How I did it
Define DSCP_TO_TC_MAP|AZURE_UPLINK and TC_TO_QUEUE_MAP|AZURE_UPLINK.
How to verify it
Verified by UT
Verified by coping the new template to a testbed, and rendering a config_db.json
Why I did it
Some sonic-mgmt platform_tests/api were failing on the 7060CX-32S
How I did it
Added the missing metadata in platform.json and platform_components.json
This is purely test data and does not impact our API implementation.
How to verify it
Run platform_tests / api and expect 100% pass rate.
Why I did it
Some sonic-mgmt platform_tests/api were failing on the 7260CX3-64
How I did it
Added the missing metadata in platform.json and platform_components.json
This is purely test data and does not impact our API implementation.
How to verify it
Run platform_tests/api and expect 100% passrate.
Signed-off-by: Neetha John <nejo@microsoft.com>
Why I did it
There is a need to have separate profiles on compute and storage and this infra update will help achieve that
How I did it
Moved buffer pool/profile and qos definitions on TD2 to a common folder and all TD2 hwsku's will reference that folder
Why I did it
Fixes#12614
How I did it
In the container_checker the database_chassis is added to expected container if device is supervisor
To detect the device is superviso, add supervisor=1 to the platform_env.conf of 7808 sup platform
How to verify it
run container_checker monit check
Signed-off-by: Arvindsrinivasan Lakshmi Narasimhan <arlakshm@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: maipbui <maibui@microsoft.com>
#### Why I did it
`subprocess.Popen()` and `subprocess.run()` is used with `shell=True`, which is very dangerous for shell injection.
`os` - not secure against maliciously constructed input and dangerous if used to evaluate dynamic content
#### How I did it
Replace `os` by `subprocess`
Remove unused functions
Why I did it
This changes should go with updated SDE for BFN. Without update we do see orchagent core dump.
How I did it
Revert changes
How to verify it
Deploy topology. No core dump appears
- Why I did it
A new SKU for MSN4700 Platform i.e. Mellanox-SN4700-V16A96
Requirements:
Breakout:
Port 1-24: 4x25G(4)[10G,1G]
Port 25-28: 2x100G[200G,50G,40G,25G,10G,1G]
Port 29-32: 2x200G[100G,50G,40G,25G,10G,1G]
Downlinks: 96 (1-24) + 4 (25-28)
Uplinks: 4 (29-32)
Shared Headroom: Enabled
Over Subscribe Ratio: 1:4
Default Topology: T0
Default Cable Length for T1: 5m
VxLAN source port range set: No
Static Policy Based Hashing Supported: No
Additional Details:
QoS params: The default ones defined in qos_config.j2 will be applied
Small Packet Percentage: Used 50% for traditional buffer model Note: For dynamic model, the value defined in LOSSLESS_TRAFFIC_PATTERN|AZURE|small_packet_percentage is used
SKU was drafted under the assumption that the downlink ports uses xcvr's that will only support the first 4 lanes of the physical port they are connected to. Hence for the ports 1-24, the last four lanes are not used
Cable Lengths used for generating buffer_defaults_{t0,t1}.j2 values
Signed-off-by: Vivek Reddy Karri <vkarri@nvidia.com>
- Why I did it
Barefoot uses hysteresis, instead of 'xon-threshold'. 'xon' is only
supported in static mode, so there is a need to add this attribute
to every mode in PG profile init file
- How I did it
'xon_offset' was added to pg_profile_lookup.ini
- How to verify it
Install and basic sanity tests including traffic.
Checked with:
pfcwd/test_pfc_config.py pfcwd/test_pfcwd_all_port_storm.py
pfcwd/test_pfcwd_function.py pfcwd/test_pfcwd_war_reboot.py
pfc_asym/test_pfc_asym.py
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Stachura <mariusz.stachura@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Stachura <mariusz.stachura@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Stachura <mariusz.stachura@intel.com>
What I did
Adding the dynamic headroom calculation support for Barefoot platforms.
Why I did it
Enabling dynamic mode for barefoot case.
How I verified it
The community tests are adjusted and pass.
A new SKU for MSN4700 Platform i.e. Mellanox-SN4700-V48C32
Requirements:
Breakout:
Port 1-24: 2x200G
Port 25-32: 4x100G
Downlinks: 48 (1-24)
Uplinks: 32 (25-32)
Shared Headroom: Enabled
Over Subscribe Ratio: 1:8
Default Topology: T1
Default Cable Length for T1: 300m
VxLAN source port range set: No
Static Policy Based Hashing Supported: No
Additional Details:
QoS params: The default ones defined in qos_config.j2 will be applied
Small Packet Percentage: Used 50% for traditional buffer model Note: For dynamic model, the value defined in LOSSLESS_TRAFFIC_PATTERN|AZURE|small_packet_percentage is used
Cable Lengths used for generating buffer_defaults_{t0,t1}.j2 values
Signed-off-by: Vivek Reddy Karri <vkarri@nvidia.com>
#### Why I did it
To add new SKU Mellanox-SN2700-D44C10 with following requirements:
| Port configuration | Value |
| ------ |--------- |
| Breakout mode for each port |**Defined in port mapping** |
| Speed of the port | **Defined in Port mapping** |
| Auto-negotiation enable/disable | **No setting required** |
| FEC mode | **No setting required** |
|Type of transceiver used | **Not needed**|
Buffer configuration | Value
------ |---------
Shared headroom | **Enabled**
Shared headroom pool factor | **2**
Dynamic Buffer | **Disable**
In static buffer scenario how many uplinks and downlinks? | **44 x50G and 2x100G Downlinks 8x100G uplinks**
2km cable support required? | **No**
Switch configuration | Value
------ |---------
Warmboot enabled? | **yes**
Should warmboot be added to SAI profile when enabled? | **yes**
Is VxLAN source port range set? | **No**
Should Vxlan source port range be added to SAI profile when set. | **No**
Is Static Policy Based Hashing enabled? | **No**
Port Mapping
| Ports | Mode |
| ------ |--------- |
| 1,2 | 1x100G |
| 3-6 | 2x50G |
| 7-10 | 1x100G |
| 11-22 | 2x50G |
| 23-26 | 1x100G |
| 27-32 | 2x50G |
Number of Uplinks / Downlinks:
TO topology: **44 x50G and 2x100G Downlinks 8x100G uplinks**.
#### How I did it
Defined the SKU as per requirements
#### How to verify it
Load the SKU and verify if all links come up and traffic passes.
Signed-off-by: maipbui <maibui@microsoft.com>
#### Why I did it
`eval()` - not secure against maliciously constructed input, can be dangerous if used to evaluate dynamic content. This may be a code injection vulnerability.
#### How I did it
`eval()` - use `literal_eval()`
changed the platform device name under nokia directory; we now need to specify marvell armhf/arm64 to provide more accurate platform identity. otherwise onie discovery won't recognize the asic being installed.
Why I did it
when we load images using onie discovery, the process was failing because of marvell ASIC mismatch
How I did it
replace the platform asic with marvell-armhf under 7215
How to verify it
load a new image using http server and verify that the image can be loaded successfully
Why I did it
For the change to support gearbox taps by gearbox_config.json (sonic-net/sonic-swss#2158), I need to add tests to sonic-swss/tests/test_gearbox.py to satisfy the test coverage of the change. The existing code in test_gearbox.py has already used brcm_gearbox_vs and here is to add some gearbox tap value to its gearbox_config.json, for the added tests in sonic-swss/tests/test_gearbox.py.
How I did it
How to verify it
This change itself will not affect existing code.
Signed-off-by: maipbui <maibui@microsoft.com>
#### Why I did it
`subprocess.Popen()` and `subprocess.run()` is used with `shell=True`, which is very dangerous for shell injection.
`os` - not secure against maliciously constructed input and dangerous if used to evaluate dynamic content
#### How I did it
Replace `os` by `subprocess`, remove `shell=True`
Remove unused functions
Signed-off-by: maipbui <maibui@microsoft.com>
Dependency: [PR (#12065)](https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-buildimage/pull/12065) needs to merge first.
#### Why I did it
`subprocess.Popen()` and `subprocess.check_output()` is used with `shell=True`, which is very dangerous for shell injection.
#### How I did it
Disable `shell=True`, enable `shell=False`
#### How to verify it
Tested on DUT, compare and verify the output between the original behavior and the new changes' behavior.
[testresults.zip](https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-buildimage/files/9550867/testresults.zip)
Why I did it
Add components data for sonic-mgmt testing
How I did it
Update platform.json and add platform_components.json
How to verify it
Ran sonic-mgmt tests (test_chassis and test_component)
Why I did it
Some Arista products do not have an SSD but use an eMMC instead.
The SsdUtil plugin is therefore extended to support both.
How I did it
Implemented ssd_util.py platform plugin loaded by ssdutil.
This plugin fallback to the default SONiC implementation if the arista one can't be found.
How to verify it
Run show platform ssdhealth on a product with an eMMC
Multi-asic Docker instances are created behind Docker's default bridge
which doesn't allow talking to other Docker instances that are in the
host network (like database-chassis).
On linecards, we configure midplane interfaces to let per-asic docker
containers talk to CHASSIS_DB on the supervisor through internal chassis
network.
On the supervisor we don't need to use chassis internal network, but we
still need a similar setup in order to allow fabric containers to talk
to database-chassis
Why I did it
This PR is to update TC_TO_QUEUE_MAP|AZURE for SKU Arista-7050CX3-32S-D48C8 and Arista-7260CX3 T0.
The change is only to align the TC_TO_QUEUE_MAP for regular traffic and bounced traffic. It has no impact on business because we have no traffic being mapped to TC2 or TC6.
How I did it
Update TC_TO_QUEUE_MAP|AZURE , and test cases as well.
How to verify it
Verified by running test case test_j2files.py
/sonic/src/sonic-config-engine$ python3 setup.py test -s tests/test_j2files.py
running test
......
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 29 tests in 25.390s
OK
- Why I did it
Remove extra empty lines in the SN2201 pg_profile_lookup.ini to make it aligned with other platforms.
This extra empty line could confuse some test cases which need to parse this file.
Signed-off-by: Kebo Liu <kebol@nvidia.com>
Why I did it
After PFC interop testing between 8102 and 7050cx3, data packet losses were observed on the Rx ports of the 7050cx3 (inflow from 8102) during testing. This was primarily due to the slower response times to react to PFC pause packets for the 8102, when receiving such frames from neighboring devices. To solve for the packet drops, the 7050cx3 pg headroom size has to be increased to 160kB.
How I did it
Modified the xoff threshold value to 160kB in the pg_profile file to allow for the buffer manager to read that value when building the image, and configuring the device
How to verify it
run "mmuconfig -l" once image is built
Signed-off-by: dojha <devojha@microsoft.com>
* Update sensor names for msn4600c for the 5.10 kernel
Looks like a sensor was removed in the 5.10 kernel for the tps53679
sensor, so the names/indexing has changed.
Related to Azure/sonic-mgmt#4513.
Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
* Update sensors file
Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
Why I did it
Content of platform.json was outdated and some platform_tests/api of sonic-mgmt were failing.
How I did it
Added the necessary values to platform.json
How to verify it
Running platform_tests/api of sonic-mgmt should yield 100% passrate.
