Why I did it
This changes should go with updated SDE for BFN. Without update we do see orchagent core dump.
How I did it
Revert changes
How to verify it
Deploy topology. No core dump appears
- Why I did it
Barefoot uses hysteresis, instead of 'xon-threshold'. 'xon' is only
supported in static mode, so there is a need to add this attribute
to every mode in PG profile init file
- How I did it
'xon_offset' was added to pg_profile_lookup.ini
- How to verify it
Install and basic sanity tests including traffic.
Checked with:
pfcwd/test_pfc_config.py pfcwd/test_pfcwd_all_port_storm.py
pfcwd/test_pfcwd_function.py pfcwd/test_pfcwd_war_reboot.py
pfc_asym/test_pfc_asym.py
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Stachura <mariusz.stachura@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Stachura <mariusz.stachura@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Stachura <mariusz.stachura@intel.com>
What I did
Adding the dynamic headroom calculation support for Barefoot platforms.
Why I did it
Enabling dynamic mode for barefoot case.
How I verified it
The community tests are adjusted and pass.
This PR includes necessary changes for correct generating BUFFER_QUEUE values in DB. Changes are based on the schema.md
Why I did it
Change format of generating BUFFER_QUEUE in DB according to schema.md and yang-model.
Old format:
"BUFFER_QUEUE": {
"Ethernet0,Ethernet100,Ethernet104,Ethernet108,Ethernet112,Ethernet116,Ethernet12,Ethernet120,Ethernet124,Ethernet16,Ethernet20,Ethernet24,Ethernet28,Ethernet32,Ethernet36,Ethernet4,Ethernet40,Ethernet44,Ethernet48,Ethernet52,Ethernet56,Ethernet60,Ethernet64,Ethernet68,Ethernet72,Ethernet76,Ethernet8,Ethernet80,Ethernet84,Ethernet88,Ethernet92,Ethernet96|queue": {
"profile": "profile"
},
"Ethernet0,Ethernet100,Ethernet104,Ethernet108,Ethernet112,Ethernet116,Ethernet12,Ethernet120,Ethernet124,Ethernet16,Ethernet20,Ethernet24,Ethernet28,Ethernet32,Ethernet36,Ethernet4,Ethernet40,Ethernet44,Ethernet48,Ethernet52,Ethernet56,Ethernet60,Ethernet64,Ethernet68,Ethernet72,Ethernet76,Ethernet8,Ethernet80,Ethernet84,Ethernet88,Ethernet92,Ethernet96|queue": {
"profile": "profile"
}
},
New format:
"BUFFER_QUEUE": {
"Ethernet0|queue": {
"profile": "profile"
},
"Ethernet0|queue": {
"profile": "profile"
},
"Ethernet4|queue": {
"profile": "profile"
},
"Ethernet4|queue": {
"profile": "profile"
},
"Ethernet8|queue": {
"profile": "profile"
},
"Ethernet8|queue": {
"profile": "profile"
},
...
}
How I did it
Updated structure of buffers_defaults jinja templates.
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kozodoi <oleksandrx.kozodoi@intel.com>
* [BFN] Implementation API for platform component
SONiC has a concept of "platform components"
this may include - CPLD, FPGA, BIOS, BMC, etc.
These changes are needed to read the version of the BIOS and BMC component.
What I did
Create components.py module
Add funcion for reading componet version to thrift interface
How I did it
The previous implementaion didn't have platform components API, so fwutil return an empty list.
After implementation of the platform component API, we have actual list of platform components and firmware versions
How to verify it
Run manually 'fwutil show status' or run unit tests
Previous command output
Chassis Module Component Version Description
------------------------ -------- ----------- --------- -------------
New command output
Chassis Module Component Version Description
------------------------ -------- ----------- --------- -------------
Chassis1 N/A BIOS 1.2.3 Chassis BIOS
BMC 5.1 Chassis BMC
Signed-off-by: Taras Keryk <tarasx.keryk@intel.com>
* [BFN] Implementation API for platform component
SONiC has a concept of "platform components"
this may include - CPLD, FPGA, BIOS, BMC, etc.
These changes are needed to read the version of the BIOS and BMC component.
What I did
Create components.py module
Add funcion for reading componet version to thrift interface
How I did it
The previous implementaion didn't have platform components API, so fwutil return an empty list.
After implementation of the platform component API, we have actual list of platform components and firmware versions
How to verify it
Run manually 'fwutil show status' or run unit tests
Previous command output
Chassis Module Component Version Description
------------------------ -------- ----------- --------- -------------
New command output
Chassis Module Component Version Description
------------------------ -------- ----------- --------- -------------
Chassis1 N/A BIOS 1.2.3 Chassis BIOS
BMC 5.1 Chassis BMC
Signed-off-by: Taras Keryk <tarasx.keryk@intel.com>
* [BFN] Implementation API for platform component
get chassis name from json
* [BFN] Implementation API for platform component
Updated platform and platrom_components json
* [BFN] Implementation API for platform component
Fixed spaces in component.py
* [BFN] Implementation API for platform component
Fixed exception in component.py
* Update chassis.py
* [BFN] Implementation API for platform component
Fixed spaces in component.py, chassis.py
* [BFN] Implementation API for platform component: Fixed spaces in component.py, chassis.py
* Fixed exception in get_bios_version
#### Why I did it
Add platform_asic file to each platform folder in sonic-device-data package. The file content will be used as the ground truth of mapping from PLATFORM_STRING to switch ASIC family.
One use case of the mapping is to prevent installing a wrong image, which targets for other ASIC platforms. For example, currently we have several ONIE images naming as sonic-*.bin, it's easy to mistakenly install the wrong image. With this mapping built into image, we could fetch the ONIE platform string, and figure out which ASIC it is using, and check we are installing the correct image.
After this PR merged, each platform vendor has to add one mandatory text file `device/PLATFORM_VENDOR/PLATFORM_STRING/platform_asic`, with the content of the platform's switch ASIC family.
I will update https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/wiki/Porting-Guide after this PR is merged.
You can get a list of the ASIC platforms by `ls -b platform | cat`. Currently the options are
```
barefoot
broadcom
cavium
centec
centec-arm64
generic
innovium
marvell
marvell-arm64
marvell-armhf
mellanox
nephos
p4
vs
```
Also support
```
broadcom-dnx
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
Test one image on DUT. And check the folders under `/usr/share/sonic/device`
Depends on Azure/sonic-utilities#1626
Depends on Azure/sonic-swss#1754
QOS tables in config db used ABNF format i.e "[TABLE_NAME|name] to refer fieldvalue to other qos tables.
Example:
Config DB:
"Ethernet92|3": {
"scheduler": "[SCHEDULER|scheduler.1]",
"wred_profile": "[WRED_PROFILE|AZURE_LOSSLESS]"
},
"Ethernet0|0": {
"profile": "[BUFFER_PROFILE|ingress_lossy_profile]"
},
"Ethernet0": {
"dscp_to_tc_map": "[DSCP_TO_TC_MAP|AZURE]",
"pfc_enable": "3,4",
"pfc_to_queue_map": "[MAP_PFC_PRIORITY_TO_QUEUE|AZURE]",
"tc_to_pg_map": "[TC_TO_PRIORITY_GROUP_MAP|AZURE]",
"tc_to_queue_map": "[TC_TO_QUEUE_MAP|AZURE]"
},
This format is not consistent with other DB schema followed in sonic.
And also this reference in DB is not required, This is taken care by YANG "leafref".
Removed this format from all platform files to consistent with other sonic db schema.
Example:
"Ethernet92|3": {
"scheduler": "scheduler.1",
"wred_profile": "AZURE_LOSSLESS"
},
Dependent pull requests:
#7752 - To modify platfrom files
#7281 - Yang model
Azure/sonic-utilities#1626 - DB migration
Azure/sonic-swss#1754 - swss change to remove ABNF format
What I did:
add platform components
How I did it:
In platform_components.json add chassis and empty component
How to verify it:
Run show platform firmware updates
#### Why I did it
To get rid of obsolete code
#### How I did it
Removed plugins folder from device/barefoot
Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Boyko <volodymyrx.boiko@intel.com>
Dynamic Port Breakout fall in case "autoneg" field exist in config_db.
- How I did it
Added "autoneg" field in sonic-port yang model.
- How to verify it
Add "autoneg" field into config_db like this:
"Ethernet8": {
"index": "2",
"lanes": "8,9,10,11",
"fec": "rs",
"pfc_asym": "off",
"mtu": "9100",
"alias": "Ethernet8",
"admin_status": "up",
"autoneg": "on",
"speed": "100000",
},
Y* profile is the name pattern for p4 programs that developed for the current platform. The difference between them is features enabled and resource reservation.
For this platform, it is expected to work on any Y profile. but after the latest changes, the first Y profile is always used.
