Why I did it
Fix the armhf build failure.
How to reproduce the issue:
docker run -it debain:bullseye bash
apt-get update && apt-get install -y python3-pip
pip3 install PyYAML==5.4.1
Error message:
Collecting PyYAML==5.4.1
Installing build dependencies ... done
Getting requirements to build wheel ... error
ERROR: Command errored out with exit status 1:
command: /usr/bin/python3 /tmp/tmp6xabslgb_in_process.py get_requires_for_build_wheel /tmp/tmp_er01ztl
....
raise AttributeError(attr)
AttributeError: cython_sources
----------------------------------------
WARNING: Discarding d63f2d7597/PyYAML-5.4.1.tar.gz (sha256)=607774cbba28732bfa802b54baa7484215f530991055bb562efbed5b2f20a45e (from https://pypi.org/simple/pyyaml/) (requires-python:>=2.7, !=3.0.*, !=3.1.*, !=3.2.*, !=3.3.*, !=3.4.*, !=3.5.*). Command errored out with exit status 1: /usr/bin/python3 /tmp/tmp6xabslgb_in_process.py get_requires_for_build_wheel /tmp/tmp_er01ztl Check the logs for full command output.
ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement PyYAML==5.4.1
ERROR: No matching distribution found for PyYAML==5.4.1
root@fa2fa92edcfd:/#
But if adding the option --no-build-isolation, then it is good, see fix.
install "PyYAML==5.4.1" --no-build-isolation
The same error can be found in the multiple builds.
Work item tracking
Microsoft ADO (number only): 24567457
How I did it
Add a build option --no-build-isolation.
#### Why I did it
After k8s upgrade a container, k8s can only know the container is running, don't know the service's status inside container. So we need a probe inside container, k8s will call the probe to check whether the container is really ready.
##### Work item tracking
- Microsoft ADO **(number only)**: 22453004
#### How I did it
Add a health check probe inside config engine container, the probe will check whether the start service exit normally or not if the start service exists and call the python script to do container self-related specific checks if the script is there. The python script should be implemented by feature owner if it's needed.
more details: [design doc](https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/master/doc/kubernetes/health-check.md)
#### How to verify it
Check path /usr/bin/readiness_probe.sh inside container.
#### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)
- [ ] 201811
- [ ] 201911
- [ ] 202006
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202106
- [ ] 202111
- [x] 202205
- [x] 202211
#### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)
- [x] 20220531.28
Why I did it
To reduce the container's dependency from host system
Work item tracking
Microsoft ADO (number only):
17713469
How I did it
Move the k8s container startup script to config engine container, other than mount it from host.
How to verify it
Check file path(/usr/share/sonic/scripts/container_startup.py) inside config engine container.
Signed-off-by: Yun Li <yunli1@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Qi Luo <qiluo-msft@users.noreply.github.com>
Install python-redis package to docker containers
#### Why I did it
This this bug: https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-buildimage/issues/14531
The 'flush_unused_database' is part of docker-database, and docker-database does not install python-redis package by itself. it's using redis installed by sonic-py-swsssdk.
So after remove sonic-py-swsssdk from container, this script break.
To this this bug and avoid similer bug happen again, install python-redis to docker containers which removed sonic-py-swsssdk .
#### How I did it
Install python-redis to containers.
#### How to verify it
Pass all UT.
Create new UT to cover this scenario: https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/pull/8032
#### Description for the changelog
Improve sudo cat command for RO user.
Currently, the build dockers are created as a user dockers(docker-base-stretch-<user>, etc) that are
specific to each user. But the sonic dockers (docker-database, docker-swss, etc) are
created with a fixed docker name and common to all the users.
docker-database:latest
docker-swss:latest
When multiple builds are triggered on the same build server that creates parallel building issue because
all the build jobs are trying to create the same docker with latest tag.
This happens only when sonic dockers are built using native host dockerd for sonic docker image creation.
This patch creates all sonic dockers as user sonic dockers and then, while
saving and loading the user sonic dockers, it rename the user sonic
dockers into correct sonic dockers with tag as latest.
docker-database:latest <== SAVE/LOAD ==> docker-database-<user>:tag
The user sonic docker names are derived from 'DOCKER_USERNAME and DOCKER_USERTAG' make env
variable and using Jinja template, it replaces the FROM docker name with correct user sonic docker name for
loading and saving the docker image.
# Why I did it
Reduce the disk space taken up during bootup and runtime.
# How I did it
1. Remove python package cache from the base image and from the containers.
2. During bootup, if logs are to be stored in memory, then don't create the `var-log.ext4` file just to delete it later during bootup.
3. For the partition containing `/host`, don't reserve any blocks for just the root user. This just makes sure all disk space is available for all users, if needed during upgrades (for example).
* Remove pip2 and pip3 caches from some containers
Only containers which appeared to have a significant pip cache size are
included here.
Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
* Don't create var-log.ext4 if we're storing logs in memory
Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
* Run tune2fs on the device containing /host to not reserve any blocks for just the root user
Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
