Why I did it
To support BGPMon sessions from each T2 linecard ASIC
Work item tracking
Microsoft ADO (number only): 17873174
How I did it
Added change in BGPMon configuration to use Loopback4096 as source interface, since this has a unique IP per ASIC.
How to verify it
Tested by manually setting up BGPMon session on T2 LC and verified that Loopback4096 could be used as source
Why I did it
dplane_fpm_nl is a new FPM implementation in FRR. The old plugin fpm will not have any new features implemented. Usage of the new plugin gives us ability to use BGP suppression feature and next hop groups in the future.
How I did it
Switch to dplane_fpm_nl zebra plugin from old fpm plugin which is not supported anymore
Remove stale patches for old fpm plugin and add similar patches for dplane_fpm_nl
How to verify it
Build and run on the switch.
Signed-off-by: Stepan Blyschak <stepanb@nvidia.com>
**- Why I did it**
FRR introduced [next hop tracking](http://docs.frrouting.org/projects/dev-guide/en/latest/next-hop-tracking.html) functionality.
That functionality requires resolving BGP neighbors before setting BGP connection (or explicit ebgp-multihop command). Sometimes (BGP MONITORS) our neighbors are not directly connected and sessions are IBGP. In this case current configuration prevents FRR to establish BGP connections. Reason would be "waiting for NHT". To fix that we need either add static routes for each not-directly connected ibgp neighbor, or enable command `ip nht resolve-via-default`
**- How I did it**
Put `ip nht resolve-via-default` into the config
**- How to verify it**
Build an image. Enable BGP_MONITOR entry and check that entry is Established or Connecting in FRR
Co-authored-by: Pavel Shirshov <pavel.contrib@gmail.com>
Jinja2 templates rendered using Python 3 interpreter, are required
to conform with Python 3 new semantics.
singed-off-by: Tamer Ahmed <tamer.ahmed@microsoft.com>
The one big bgp configuration template was splitted into chunks.
Currently we have three types of bgp neighbor peers:
general bgp peers. They are represented by CONFIG_DB::BGP_NEIGHBOR table entries
dynamic bgp peers. They are represented by CONFIG_DB::BGP_PEER_RANGE table entries
monitors bgp peers. They are represented by CONFIG_DB::BGP_MONITORS table entries
This PR introduces three templates for each peer type:
bgp policies: represent policieas that will be applied to the bgp peer-group (ip prefix-lists, route-maps, etc)
bgp peer-group: represent bgp peer group which has common configuration for the bgp peer type and uses bgp routing policy from the previous item
bgp peer-group instance: represent bgp configuration, which will be used to instatiate a bgp peer-group for the bgp peer-type. Usually this one is simple, consist of the referral to the bgp peer-group, bgp peer description and bgp peer ip address.
This PR redefined constant.yml file. Now this file has a setting for to use or don't use bgp_neighbor metadata. This file has more parameters for now, which are not used. They will be used in the next iteration of bgpcfgd.
Currently all tests have been disabled. I'm going to create next PR with the tests right after this PR is merged.
I'm going to introduce better bgpcfgd in a short time. It will include support of dynamic changes for the templates.
FIX:: #4231
