- Why I did it
Support DSCP remapping in dual ToR topo on T0 switch for SKU Mellanox-SN4600c-C64, Mellanox-SN4600c-D48C40, Mellanox-SN2700, Mellanox-SN2700-D48C8.
- How I did it
Regarding buffer settings, originally, there are two lossless PGs and queues 3, 4. In dual ToR scenario, the lossless traffic from the leaf switch to the uplink of the ToR switch can be bounced back.
To avoid PFC deadlock, we need to map the bounce-back lossless traffic to different PGs and queues. Therefore, 2 additional lossless PGs and queues are allocated on uplink ports on ToR switches.
On uplink ports, map DSCP 2/6 to TC 2/6 respectively
On downlink ports, both DSCP 2/6 are still mapped to TC 1
Buffer adjusted according to the ports information:
Mellanox-SN4600c-C64:
56 downlinks 50G + 8 uplinks 100G
Mellanox-SN4600c-D48C40, Mellanox-SN2700, Mellanox-SN2700-D48C8:
24 downlinks 50G + 8 uplinks 100G
- How to verify it
Unit test.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Sun <stephens@nvidia.com>
- Why I did it
Support Mellanox-SN4600C-C64 as T1 switch in dual-ToR scenario
This is to port #11032 and #11299 from 202012 to master.
Support additional queue and PG in buffer templates, including both traditional and dynamic model
Support mapping DSCP 2/6 to lossless traffic in the QoS template.
Add macros to generate additional lossless PG in the dynamic model
Adjust the order in which the generic/dedicated (with additional lossless queues) macros are checked and called to generate buffer tables in common template buffers_config.j2
Buffer tables are rendered via using macros.
Both generic and dedicated macros are defined on our platform. Currently, the generic one is called as long as it is defined, which causes the generic one always being called on our platform. To avoid it, the dedicated macrio is checked and called first and then the generic ones.
Support MAP_PFC_PRIORITY_TO_PRIORITY_GROUP on ports with additional lossless queues.
On Mellanox-SN4600C-C64, buffer configuration for t1 is calculated as:
40 * 100G downlink ports with 4 lossless PGs/queues, 1 lossy PG, and 3 lossy queues
16 * 100G uplink ports with 2 lossless PGs/queues, 1 lossy PG, and 5 lossy queues
Signed-off-by: Stephen Sun <stephens@nvidia.com>
- Why I did it
Need to remove old static configs from sai.profile files.
New implementation: Azure/sonic-swss#1959
New configuration: #9658
- How I did it
Remove SAI_VXLAN_SRCPORT_RANGE_ENABLE=1 lines from files per HWSKU
- How to verify it
When static config is removed following test will fail (src port will be in range 0-255)
py.test vxlan/test_vnet_vxlan.py --inventory "../ansible/inventory, ../ansible/veos" --host-pattern (testbed)-t0 --module-path ../ansible/library/ --testbed (testbed)-t0 --testbed_file ../ansible/testbed.csv --allow_recover --assert plain --log-cli-level info --show-capture=no -ra --showlocals --disable_loganalyzer --skip_sanity --upper_bound_udp_port 65535 --lower_bound_udp_port 64128
Why I did it
Fix typo and missing files in SN3800 and SN4600C's buffer templates
How I did it
ingress_lossless_xoff_size => ingress_lossless_pool_xoff add missing files for SN4600C-D100C12S2
How to verify it
Deploy the fix and verify whether the device can be up.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Sun <stephens@nvidia.com>
- Why I did it
Also recalculated all parameters with the latest algorithm with per-speed peer response time taken into account
- How I did it
Detailed information of each SKU:
C64:
t0: 32 100G downlinks and 32 100G uplinks
t1: 56 100G downlinks and 8 100G uplinks with 2km-cable supported
D112C8: 112 50G downlinks and 8 100G uplinks.
D48C40: 48 50G downlinks, 32 100G downlinks, and 8 100G uplinks
D100C12S2: 4 100G downlinks, 2 10G downlinks, 100 50G downlinks, and 8 100G uplinks
2km cable is supported for C64 on t1 only
- How to verify it
Run regression test (QoS)
Signed-off-by: Stephen Sun <stephens@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Sun stephens@nvidia.com
Why I did it
Support zero buffer profiles
Add buffer profiles and pool definition for zero buffer profiles
Support applying zero profiles on INACTIVE PORTS
Enable dynamic buffer manager to load zero pools and profiles from a JSON file
Dependency: It depends on Azure/sonic-swss#1910 and submodule advancing PR once the former merged.
How I did it
Add buffer profiles and pool definition for zero buffer profiles
If the buffer model is static:
Apply normal buffer profiles to admin-up ports
Apply zero buffer profiles to admin-down ports
If the buffer model is dynamic:
Apply normal buffer profiles to all ports
buffer manager will take care when a port is shut down
Update buffers_config.j2 to support INACTIVE PORTS by extending the existing macros to generate the various buffer objects, including PGs, queues, ingress/egress profile lists
Originally, all the macros to generate the above buffer objects took active ports only as an argument
Now that buffer items need to be generated on inactive ports as well, an extra argument representing the inactive ports need to be added
To be backward compatible, a new series of macros are introduced to take both active and inactive ports as arguments
The original version (with active ports only) will be checked first. If it is not defined, then the extended version will be called
Only vendors who support zero profiles need to change their buffer templates
Enable buffer manager to load zero pools and profiles from a JSON file:
The JSON file is provided on a per-platform basis
It is copied from platform/<vendor> folder to /usr/share/sonic/temlates folder in compiling time and rendered when the swss container is being created.
To make code clean and reduce redundant code, extract common macros from buffer_defaults_t{0,1}.j2 of all SKUs to two common files:
One in Mellanox-SN2700-D48C8 for single ingress pool mode
The other in ACS-MSN2700 for double ingress pool mode
Those files of all other SKUs will be symbol link to the above files
Update sonic-cfggen test accordingly:
Adjust example output file of JSON template for unit test
Add unit test in for Mellanox's new buffer templates.
How to verify it
Regression test.
Unit test in sonic-cfggen
Run regression test and manually test.
- Why I did it
Add NVIDIA Copyright header to "mellanox" files
- How I did it
Add NVIDIA Copyright header as a comment for Mellanox files
- How to verify it
Sanity tests and PR checkers.
Depends on Azure/sonic-utilities#1626
Depends on Azure/sonic-swss#1754
QOS tables in config db used ABNF format i.e "[TABLE_NAME|name] to refer fieldvalue to other qos tables.
Example:
Config DB:
"Ethernet92|3": {
"scheduler": "[SCHEDULER|scheduler.1]",
"wred_profile": "[WRED_PROFILE|AZURE_LOSSLESS]"
},
"Ethernet0|0": {
"profile": "[BUFFER_PROFILE|ingress_lossy_profile]"
},
"Ethernet0": {
"dscp_to_tc_map": "[DSCP_TO_TC_MAP|AZURE]",
"pfc_enable": "3,4",
"pfc_to_queue_map": "[MAP_PFC_PRIORITY_TO_QUEUE|AZURE]",
"tc_to_pg_map": "[TC_TO_PRIORITY_GROUP_MAP|AZURE]",
"tc_to_queue_map": "[TC_TO_QUEUE_MAP|AZURE]"
},
This format is not consistent with other DB schema followed in sonic.
And also this reference in DB is not required, This is taken care by YANG "leafref".
Removed this format from all platform files to consistent with other sonic db schema.
Example:
"Ethernet92|3": {
"scheduler": "scheduler.1",
"wred_profile": "AZURE_LOSSLESS"
},
Dependent pull requests:
#7752 - To modify platfrom files
#7281 - Yang model
Azure/sonic-utilities#1626 - DB migration
Azure/sonic-swss#1754 - swss change to remove ABNF format
*Edited platform.json for 4600 & 4600C
*Edited hwsku.json and port_config.ini files for all the SKU's present under these platforms
Signed-off-by: Vivek Reddy Karri <vkarri@nvidia.com>
- Why I did it
To create SDK dump on Mellanox devices when SDK event has occurred.
- How I did it
Set the SKUs keys needed to initialize the feature in SAI.
- How to verify it
Simulate SDK event and check that dump is created in the expected path.
